The following ran on the June 17, 2013, edition of The Hill. Political scientist Cal Jillson provided expertise for this story.
June 18, 2013
By Justin Sink
Five months into his second term, allies and enemies are as confounded as ever about who President Obama really is.
Is he the dyed-in-the-wool liberal that his biggest supporters and critics suggest? Or is he a pragmatic, even cynical, politician who cares more for his popularity than taking risks for his ideological goals or living up to his rhetoric?
Even in the short period since his reelection, Obama has provided evidence to support conflicting interpretations.
His efforts to pass immigration reform, the unsuccessful push for stricter gun controls and tax hikes on high earners buttress the case for Obama-as-ideologue. But the president has also stoutly defended National Security Agency (NSA) programs that seize U.S. phone records and monitor Internet use, prompting comparisons with his predecessor, George W. Bush.
Obama came to power on the strength of his opposition to war in Iraq but is now poised to intervene in the civil war in Syria.
On top of that, there is the Justice Department’s pursuit of leakers and reporters, which critics say displays an authoritarianism that repels erstwhile liberal supporters and inflames long-standing libertarian-conservative opponents.
“President Obama has always been instinctively careful. And while he has progressive values, he’s pursued them in a careful and pragmatic way that has left his base feeling unenthusiastic [and] dispirited,” said Cal Jillson, a political scientist at Southern Methodist University....
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/305851-who-is-he-obama-keeps-allies-enemies-guessing-in-second-term#ixzz2WaFAkV5H
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook