The following is from the May 30, 2009, edition of The Christian Science Monitor. Political Science Prof. Cal Jillson of SMU's Dedman College provided expertise for this story.
June 1, 2009
By Linda Feldmann
If the Obama administration was trying to set a trap for the Republican Party in nominating Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, it could not have done a better job.
As an outspoken Latina, Judge Sotomayor has said plenty of things to rile up conservatives. Most pointedly, she once said that a “wise Latina woman” judge would “more often than not” make better decisions than a “white male who hasn’t lived that life.”
Prominent conservatives pounced with rhetoric that many party members consider over-the-top. Former House speaker Newt Gingrich called Sotomayor a “Latina woman racist” and demanded she withdraw her nomination. Talk radio host Rush Limbaugh compared her to former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke. Former Rep. Tom Tancredo (R) of Colorado called the Hispanic group National Council of La Raza, of which Sotomayor is a member, “a Latino KKK without the hoods or nooses.”
Senior elected Republicans have sharply rejected the rhetoric and called for more focus on her record. But the first round of reaction to Sotomayor goes to the White House. Polls show more Americans approve than disapprove her nomination, and the out-of-power GOP is further mired in internecine warfare. Any Republican appeal to Latino voters, who already voted for Obama last November by a 2-to-1 margin, faces an uphill climb that has just gotten steeper.
“The broader problem that the Republicans have at this point is that as long as Limbaugh and Gingrich are the faces of the Republican Party, they continue in a losing situation,” says Cal Jillson, a political scientist at Southern Methodist University in Dallas. “And so [elected GOP officials] were trying to pull them back, recognizing that Sotomayor was very likely to be confirmed, absent some stunning development.”
Read the full story.
# # #