Project Maximize, funded in 2005 by the Office of
Special Education Projects (OSEP) in the U.S. Department of Education, is a
4-year longitudinal study whose goal is to determine if what is known about
teaching reading to students with reading difficulties applies to teaching
students with cognitive disabilities and autism. Instruction began in the
fall of 2005 in an urban school district with 137 children who are mildly or moderately mentally
retarded. Half of the students were assigned to treatment or control groups;
those in treatment received daily instruction in reading in small groups of 2-4
students.
Purpose
In the current research, we seek to determine if the intense and explicit instruction that has worked for children who struggle with reading, are likely dyslexic, or are English language learners also works for children who are mentally retarded. Typically these students have only been taught to read functional sight words. However, there are two components to reading: processing words in print and processing meaning from those words. This study works on both aspects.
Procedures
This study
is being conducted as a randomized trial with two groups. One group of students receives a
special education program that represents current best practices, which are provided by the
Ft Worth schools with support from our staff. The second group of children receive the Proactive Reading intervention from highly trained teachers.
Students meet daily in groups of three for 55-minute sessions across all four
years of the study. Each session has three components: (1) Proactive Reading (40
minutes), an empirically proven intervention now commercially available from
SRA, (2) Language Support (5 minutes) to assist these students to better understand
the content presented in Proactive Reading, and (3) Oral Language
Comprehension (10 minutes), which builds on empirically proven storybook
routines.
To determine the impact of reading instruction as compared to “current best practice,” the study collects measures of multiple dimensions of reading and language and intellect, including measures pretest/posttest and continuous progress measures collected every 3 weeks across all 4 years. Further, we observe during experimental and contrast instruction and measure level of fidelity of the intervention at multiple points each year. Last, we collect student IEP records and conduct teacher and parent interviews to allow us to determine if our interventions facilitate access to the general education curriculum.
Presentations
Presentations (PDFs) describing aspects of Project Maximize are attached.
Evidence-Based Practices for Literacy Instruction for Children with Cognitive Disabilities
Maximizing Literacy Outcomes for Students with Mental Retardation: Study Findings
Children with Mental Retardation Can Learn to Read: Setting and Achieving Goals.
Video Clips
Curriculum Information/Materials
Foundation Level. pre-publication
The foundation level of the curriculum teaches
kindergarten-level reading skills.
Level One: Proactive. Published under
Early Interventions in Reading through SRA
The first level of the curriculum teaches first grade level
reading skills and has been found to be effective through several research
studies (link) and is available for
purchase from SRA.
Level Two Proactive
The second level of the curriculum teaches second through
fourth grade reading skills.
Stop and Go Game. pre-publication
This game teaches children to blend sounds to make words.
See the attached video link of it being played. The game can be obtained
via request at Maximize@smu.edu
Language Component. pre-publication
This component of the curriculum was added to enhance
vocabulary skills.
Press
Links (PDFs)
Research Team Hopes to
Hone Skills of Retarded Youth
(Dallas Morning News, March 2005)
Useful Websites
Reading Rockets - This project provides information and
resources to teachers
and parents about reading instruction to young children.
www.ReadingRockets.org
SRA Publishing - Makes available direct-instruction
curricula that have proven to be effective in teaching reading to struggling
students.
www.sra.com
Division of Developmental Disabilities - This division of
the CEC provides specific support to those working with students with
cognitive disabilities, autism, and other related disabilities.
www.dddcec.org/
DIBELS -
These assessments were used to monitor the student's
progress on key reading skills. The website also provides links
to good curricular activities to support reading.
dibels.uoregon.edu/
Council for Exceptional Children - This professional
organization is dedicated to improving educational outcomes for individuals with exceptionalities, students with disabilities, and/or the gifted. It provides information and resources for parents and teachers on issues related to policy, advocacy, and professional development.
www.cec.sped.org
Project Raise - This project coordinates with Maximize.
Researchers
at the University of North Carolina-Charlotte are investigating teaching
reading to students with moderate to severe mental retardation.
http://education.uncc.edu/access/RAISEProject.htm
Resource Literature
Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., Kameenui, E. J., & Tarver, S. G. (2004). Direct Instruction Reading. (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
To learn more, contact:
Dr. Francesca Jones (fjones@smu.edu)