skip to main content
article

An empirical study of the effectiveness of telepresence as a business meeting mode

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 December 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Telepresence is a technology that has emerged as a promising mode for conducting business meetings with distributed participants, since it enables an immersive lifelike experience. However, telepresence meetings are substantially more expensive than audio- and video-conferencing meetings. This paper examines the justification of using telepresence for meetings. Based on an extensive literature review, two research questions about the effectiveness of telepresence for achieving meeting objectives are formulated. These are then addressed in an empirical study consisting of two phases, conducted in a large multinational corporation in which telepresence is widely used. In Phase 1, a list of meeting objectives is compiled. In Phase 2, the effectiveness of telepresence is analyzed relative to audio-conferencing, video-conferencing, and face-to-face for these objectives, based on input from 392 meeting organizers. The results of the analysis indicate that although the effectiveness of telepresence is higher than the effectiveness of audio- and video-conferencing for several meeting objectives, it is not significantly different from the effectiveness of face-to-face for any objective.

References

  1. Bartlett J (2007) Telepresence: beautiful and expensive. Bus Commun Rev 37(6):20---25Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bordia P (1997) Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication: a synthesis of the experimental literature. J Bus Commun 34(1):99---120Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Borges MR, Pino JA, Fuller DA, Salgado AC (1999) Key issues in the design of an asynchronous system to support meeting preparation. Decis Support Syst 27(3):269---287 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bos N, Olson J, Gergle D, Olson G, Wright Z (2002) Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Minneapolis, MN, pp 135---140 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Briggs RO, de Vreede G-J, Reinig BA (2003) A theory and measurement of meeting satisfaction. In: 36th Hawaii international conference on system sciences Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Brown SA, Dennis AR, Venkatesh V (2010) Predicting collaboration technology use: integrating technology adoption and collaboration research. J Manag Inf Syst 27(2):9---54 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Burke K, Chidambaram L (1999) How much bandwidth is enough? A longitudinal examination of media characteristics and group outcomes. MIS Q 23(4):557---579 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Burton-Jones A, Grange C (2013) From use to effective use: a representation theory perspective. Inf Syst Res 24(3):632---658Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Buxton WAS (1991) Telepresence: integrating shared task and person spaces. In: Proceedings of groupware, pp 27---36Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell JA (1998) Participation in videoconferenced meetings: user disposition and meeting context. Inf Manag 34(6):329---338 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Carlson JR, George JF (2004) Media appropriateness in the conduct and discovery of deceptive communication: the relative influence of richness and synchronicity. Group Decis Negot 13(2):191---210Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Carlson JR, Zmud R (1999) Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Acad Manag J 42(2):153---170Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Chidambaram L, Jones B (1993) Impact of communication medium and computer support on group perceptions and performance: a comparison of face-to-face and dispersed meetings. MIS Q 17(4):465---491 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Christie B, Kingan S (1977) Electronic alternatives to the business meeting: managers' choices. J Occup Psychol 50(4):265---273Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Conti J (2007) Technology telepresence: i see live people. Eng Manag J 17(3):12---16Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Costello R (2011) Market analysis: worldwide enterprise videoconferencing and telepresence 2011---2015 forecast. IDC 1---37Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Culnan MJ (1984) The dimensions of accessibility to online information: implications for implementing office information systems. ACM Trans Inf Syst 2(2):141---150 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Daft R (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manag Sci 32(5):554---571Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Daft R, Lengel R, Trevino LK (1987) Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: implications for information systems. MIS Q 11(3):355---366 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Davis F (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319---340 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Davis F, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 35(8):982---1003 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Dennis A, Fuller R, Valacich J (2008) Media, tasks, and communication processes: a theory of media synchronicity. MIS Q 32(3):575---600 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Dennis A, Fuller R, Valacich J (2009) Media synchronicity and media choice. In: Hartmann T (ed) Media choice: a theoretical and empirical overview. Routledge, New York, pp 247---273Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Dennis A, George J, Jessup L, Nunamaker JF, Vogel DR (1988) Information technology to support electronic meetings. MIS Q 12(4):591---624 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Dennis A, Kinney S (1998) Testing media richness theory in the new media: the effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Inf Syst Res 9(3):256---274 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Dennis A, Valacich J (1999) Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity. In: 32nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Dennis A, Wixom B, Vandenberg R (2001) Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Q 25(2):167---193 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Denstadli JM, Gripsrud M, Hjorthol R, Julsrud TE (2013) Videoconferencing and business air travel: do new technologies produce new interaction patterns? Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 29:1---13Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Denstadli JM, Julsrud TE, Hjorthol RJ (2011) Videoconferencing as a mode of communication: a comparative study of the use of videoconferencing and face-to-face meetings. J Bus Tech Commun 26(1):65---91Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. DeSanctis G, Gallupe R (1987) A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Manag Sci 33(5):589---609Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Ferran C, Watts S (2008) Videoconferencing in the field: a heuristic processing model. Manag Sci 54(9):1565---1578 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Fish R, Kraut R, Root R, Rice R (1992) Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference, pp 37---48 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Fjermestad J (2004) An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research. Decis Support Syst 37(2):239---263 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Fuller RM, Dennis AR (2009) Does fit matter? The impact of task-technology fit and appropriation on team performance in repeated tasks. Inf Syst Res 20(1):2---17 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. George JF, Carlson JR, Valacich JS (2013) Media selection as a strategic component of communication. MIS Q 37(4):1233---1251 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Goodhue D, Thompson R (1995) Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q 19(2):213---236 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Habermas J (1987) The theory of communicative action. Heinemann Education, LondonGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Handy C (1995) Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Bus Rev 73(3):40---50Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoegl M, Gemuenden HG (2001) Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: a theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organ Sci 12(4):435---449 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Hollan J, Stornetta S (1992) Beyond being there. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems--CHI'92. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, pp 119---125 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Hollingshead AB, Mcgrath JE, O'Connor KM (1993) Group task performance and communication technology: a longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Res 24(3):307---333Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Jarvenpaa SL, Leidner DE (1999) Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ Sci 10(6):791---815 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. King WR, He J (2006) A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inf Manag 43(6):740---755 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. King R, Xia W (1997) Media appropriateness: effects of experience on communication media choice. Decis Sci 28(4):877---910Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Kock N (2001) Compensatory adaptation to a lean medium: an action research investigation of electronic communication in process improvement groups. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 44(4):267---285Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Kock N (2004) The psychobiological model: towards a new theory of computer-mediated communication based on darwinian evolution. Organ Sci 15(3):327---348 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Kock N (2007) Media naturalness and compensatory encoding: the burden of electronic media obstacles is on senders. Decis Support Syst 44(1):175---187 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Kock N (2009) Information systems theorizing based on evolutionary psychology: an interdisciplinary review and theory integration framework. MIS Q 33(2):395---418 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Kydd C, Ferry D (1994) Managerial use of video conferencing. Inf Manag 27:369---375 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Leach DJ, Rogelberg SG, Warr PB, Burnfield JL (2009) Perceived meeting effectiveness: the role of design characteristics. J Bus Psychol 24:65---76Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Lee Y, Kozar K, Larsen K (2003) The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 12(1):752---780Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Lee Y, Kozar K, Larsen K (2009) Avatar e-mail versus traditional e-mail: perceptual difference and media selection difference. Decis Support Syst 46(2):451---467 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Lengel RH, Daft RL (1989) The selection of communication media as an executive skill. Acad Manag Exec 2(3):225---232Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Lin C, Standing C, Liu Y-C (2008) A model to develop effective virtual teams. Decis Support Syst 45(4):1031---1045 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Lombard M, Ditton T (1997) At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. J Comput Mediat Commun.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Lu J-L, Peeta S (2009) Analysis of the factors that influence the relationship between business air travel and videoconferencing. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 43(8):709---721Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Markus M (1987) Toward a "critical mass" theory of interactive media universal access, interdependence and diffusion. Commun Res 14(5):491---511Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Markus M (1994) Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organ Sci 5(4):502---527 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. McGrath J (1984) Groups: interaction and performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Miranda S, Saunders CS (2003) The social construction of meaning: an alternative perspective on information sharing. Inf Syst Res 14(1):87---106 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Neter J, Kutner M, Nachtsheim C, Wasserman W (1996) Applied linear statistical models. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Nunamaker JF, Dennis AR, Valacich JS, Vogel DR, George JF (1991) Electornic meeting systems to support group work. Commun ACM 34(7):40---61 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Ocker R, Fjermestad J, Hiltz SR, Johnson K (1998) Effects of four modes of group communication on the outcomes of software requirements determination. J Manag Inf Syst 15(1):99---118 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Ocker R, Hiltz SR, Turoff M, Fjermestad J (1995) Structuring on software requirements the effects of distributed group support and process structuring on software teams: requirements development results on creativity and quality. J Manag Inf Syst 12(3):127---153 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Olson GM, Olson JS (2000) Distance matters. Hum Comput Interact 15:139---178 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Palvia P, Pinjani P, Cannoy S, Jacks T (2011) Contextual constraints in media choice: beyond information richness. Decis Support Syst 51(3):657---670 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Reinsch NL, Beswick RW (1990) Voice mail versus conventional channels: a cost minimization analysis of individuals' preferences. Acad Manag J 33(4):801---816Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Reinsch NL, Turner JW, Tinsley CH (2008) Multicommunicating: a practice whose time has come? Acad Manag Rev 33(2):391---403Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Rice RE (1992) Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: a multi-site exploration of media richness. Organ Sci 3(4):475---500 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Rice RE (1993) Media appropriateness: using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Hum Commun Res 19(4):451---484Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Robert L, Dennis AR (2005) Paradox of richness: a cognitive model of media choice. IEEE Prof Commun 48(1):10---21Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Roberts TL, Lowry PB, Sweeney PD (2006) An evaluation of the impact of social presence through group size and the use of collaborative software on group member "voice" in face-to-face and computer-mediated task groups. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 49(1):28---43Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Rogelberg SG, Scott CW, Agypt B, Williams J, Kello JE, McCausland T, Olien JL (2013) Lateness to meetings: examination of an unexplored temporal phenomenon. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 23(3):323---341Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Romano NC, Nunamaker JF (2001) Meeting analysis: findings from research and practice. In: 34th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, IEEE, pp 1---13 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Rosetti D, Surynt T (1985) Video teleconferencing and performance. J Bus Commun 22(4):25---32Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Shim JP, Warkentin M, Courtney JF, Power DJ, Sharda R, Carlsson C (2002) Past, present, and future of decision support technology. Decis Support Syst 33(2):111---126 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Short J, Williams E, Christie B (1976) The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley, LondonGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Simon A (2006) Computer-mediated communication: task performance and satisfaction. J Soc Psychol 146(3):349---379Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Standaert W, Muylle S, Basu A (2011) Telepresence in business meetings. In: 32nd international conference on information systemsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Standaert W, Muylle S, Basu A (2013) Assessing the effectiveness of telepresence for business meetings. In: 46th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, IEEE, pp 549---558 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Stitzlein C, Alem L (2006) When mixing physical presence with telepresence: analysis of a pilot study. Presence, pp 102---103Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Straub D, Karahanna E (1998) Knowledge worker communications and recipient availability: toward a task closure explanation of media choice. Organ Sci 9(2):160---175 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Straus S, McGrath J (1994) Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. J Appl Psychol 79(1):87---97Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. Te'eni D (2001) Review: a cognitive---affective model of organizational communication for designing IT. MIS Q 25(2):251---312 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Trevino LK, Lengel RH, Daft RL (1987) Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations: a symbolic interactionist perspective. Commun Res 14(5):553---574Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. Trevino LK, Webster J, Stein EW (2000) Making connections: complementary influences on communication media choices attitudes, and use. Organ Sci 11(2):163---182 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Tung L, Turban E (1998) A proposed research framework for distributed group support systems. Decis Support Syst 23(2):175---188 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Venkatesh V, Bala H (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis Sci 39(2):273---315Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 46(2):186---204 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis G, Davis F (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425---478 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  91. Verdantix (2010) Carbon disclosure project study 2010: the telepresence revolution, pp 1---24Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Walther JB (1996) Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Commun Res 23(1):3---43Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Walther JB, Bazarova NN (2008) Validation and application of electronic propinquity theory to computer-mediated communication in groups. Commun Res 35(5):622---645Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  94. Watson-Manheim M-B, Bélanger F (2007) Communication media repertoires: dealing with the multiplicity of media choices. MIS Q 31(2):267---293 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  95. Westmyer SA, DiCioccio RL, Rubin RB (1998) Appropriateness and effectiveness of communication channels in competent interpersonal communication. J Commun 48(3):27---48Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. Yates J, Orlikowski W (1992) Genres of organizational communication: a structurational approach to studying communication and media. Acad Manag Rev 17(2):299---326Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  97. Zigurs I, Buckland B (1998) A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Q 22(3):313---334 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An empirical study of the effectiveness of telepresence as a business meeting mode

          Recommendations

          Reviews

          Barrett Hazeltine

          Telepresence is enhanced video conferencing, where participants from various locations see each other in life-size, voices seem to come from the speaker, lighting and furniture for each site are matched, and more is done to create the sense of actual presence. Telepresence fits into a technological sequence: audio conferencing, video sequencing, telepresence, and face-to-face. The question addressed is the comparative effectiveness of telepresence. One result of the research is that, for business meetings, telepresence is equally effective as face-to-face. The comparative effectiveness with audio and video conferencing depends on the objective of the meeting. Telepresence was more effective than either of the conferencing modes when the objectives were building trust, communicating positive or negative feelings, giving or receiving feedback, and clarifying a concept. For every objective, telepresence was never significantly worse than audio or video conferencing. The research was done at a large, global, US-based company. The first research phase selected pertinent meeting objectives by interviewing 39 senior managers. The second research phase surveyed 392 meeting organizers and 139 attendees, asking them about a recent meeting, objectives, and effectiveness. Data was also taken about meeting duration and number of attendees. The paper includes a thorough and valid statistical analysis of the data. The paper is clear but hardly succinct. It is somewhat surprising-but gratifying-to system designers that telepresence was considered as effective as face-to-face communication. Online Computing Reviews Service

          Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

          Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access